<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A present from Cynthia</title>
	<link>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80</link>
	<description>Breezing the shoot. Random mutterings of a Web Developer.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Rawson</title>
		<link>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-385</link>
		<author>Joan Rawson</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-385</guid>
					<description>Thanks for posting this, it's the first I've heard of it and the site is failing on exactly what you said. Is it going to be a problem if I leave it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, it&#8217;s the first I&#8217;ve heard of it and the site is failing on exactly what you said. Is it going to be a problem if I leave it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnieB</title>
		<link>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-386</link>
		<author>ConnieB</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-386</guid>
					<description>Well this is good. More work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this is good. More work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonid</title>
		<link>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-387</link>
		<author>Leonid</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-387</guid>
					<description>What is this mean for site? Will not be right in browser? What need to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this mean for site? Will not be right in browser? What need to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaybee</title>
		<link>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-389</link>
		<author>Jaybee</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jbvisions.co.uk/voices/archives/80#comment-389</guid>
					<description>The error is at Priority 2. It's entirely up to you what you want to do about it. If you want Cynthia to report a clean page then you'll need to make sure you add the missing lines in the head of each of your pages. It won't affect Browser layout as they're Meta Tags and not involved in the display. 

As I understand it, the DDA and the EU regs require business sites to comply with all Priority 1 checks and &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; of Priority 2 so you won't be in any trouble if you don't do it.

I'd be interested to know why these have been added to the checks. The Metas are used to declare the natural language of the document and are most useful for non-English or multi-language sites which is why, I thought, they were optional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The error is at Priority 2. It&#8217;s entirely up to you what you want to do about it. If you want Cynthia to report a clean page then you&#8217;ll need to make sure you add the missing lines in the head of each of your pages. It won&#8217;t affect Browser layout as they&#8217;re Meta Tags and not involved in the display. </p>
<p>As I understand it, the DDA and the EU regs require business sites to comply with all Priority 1 checks and <i>most</i> of Priority 2 so you won&#8217;t be in any trouble if you don&#8217;t do it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know why these have been added to the checks. The Metas are used to declare the natural language of the document and are most useful for non-English or multi-language sites which is why, I thought, they were optional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
